Unidad de Posgrado

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/7849

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.DERECHO A LA LIBERTAD

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    La Criminología Mediática en el Ecuador y su influencia en el dictado de la prisión preventiva
    (2021) Moyolema Chaglla, Luis Alberto; Granizo Montalvo, César Audberto
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following work refers to the topic of study in question. The objective of this research is to analyze why prosecutors require that personal precautionary measures of pretrial detention be dictated when this measure is a measure of last resort and the right to freedom is a right that is enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, and it is evident that, in the ventilation of trials related to corruption, collective interest is generated. The thesis is that media criminology, through the media, generates pressure on authorities because they disseminate news of a criminally relevant conduct to crimes such as influence peddling, bribery, extortion, which seeks particular benefits. The methodology is qualitative, since an analysis was made of the different speeches of the procedural subjects in the different hearings of Formulation of Charges, which showed the qualities that affect the media in the cases of the subject of the present investigation; and in the quantitative part, the criminal news were counted; likewise, the Inductive-Deductive, Analytical-Synthetic, Historical-Logical methods were used. As a result, the expected result was reached, that is to say, it was evidenced how the media affect today, in the Constitutional State of rights and justice, contributing, in xv some cases to the judgment of criminality based on stereotypes or stigmatizations; and how the media are part of the social reality with clear incidence in the treatment of the phenomena of communication are part of the social reality with clear incidence in the treatment of criminal phenomena and in the promulgation of criminal laws.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Derecho a la libertad y aplicación de la prisión preventiva en delitos de robo y hurto
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-10) Jiménez Panimboza, Adriana Elizabeth; Guevara Fuentes, José Rubén
    The increase in the number of persons deprived of liberty in Ecuador draws the attention of all State institutions. State security is not reflected by the fact that there are more people incarcerated; On the contrary, in many countries a perverse circle of insecurity has taken root, where prisons constitute precisely one of its main links. The adversarial accusatory system, prosecutors and defense lawyers litigate before an impartial judge. But reforms to justice systems were oriented and had a fundamentally punitive approach, contravening logic, common sense and, above all, specialized recommendations. It should also be mentioned that Ecuadorian criminal legislation, as of August 10, 2014, the date on which the Organic Integral Criminal Code entered into force encouraged the abuse of pretrial detention. The judges currently issue preventive detention to a person without sufficient elements of trial since they do not know the profile of the persons processed, demographic data and family context: if they have family charges, labor relations, study, partner, income level, Disability, despite the lack of knowledge, judges issue preventive detention.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    El derecho a la seguridad jurídica y la modificación del procedimiento de rebaja de penas
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-09) Parra Zimbaña, Laura Leonila; Pazmiño Vargas, Klever Alonso
    Legal Security in Ecuador is recognized as Right, Principle and Guarantee. As Law, it is established in Art. 82 of the Constitution of the Republic, which is based on respect for the Fundamental Charter and on the existence of previous, clear, public legal norms applied by the competent authorities (Constituent Assembly, 2008). As a Principle, it recognizes the legislature as being constitutionally responsible for creating, modifying or repealing the regulations that involve constitutional rights, and at the same time, it charges the judges with giving certainty and confidence to the citizens regarding the correct application of the law, since, Only in this way can people predict the effects and consequences of their acts or omissions. And as a Guarantee, Legal Security is the foundational and common mechanism for all individuals, guaranteed in the Constitutional Charter in order to protect the individual and collective rights of the inhabitants of the State. In the specific case, since the persons deprived of liberty are members of the Ecuadorian State and constitutionally recognized as a group of priority attention, they enjoy the right to Legal Security and other rights inherent to the human being, therefore, the Council of the Judiciary when issuing Resolution 085-2014 establishes a new requirement and modifies the procedure already existing in the relevant regulations to access the benefit of Reduction of Penalties for Merits, violated the Legal Security constitutionally established, since said requirement that varies the procedure is not covered by Favorability for the inmate, but distressing the procedure that must be followed by those deprived of liberty who have fulfilled the requirements to obtain their early release. This resolution also contravenes the Principle of Reserve of Law, since the Council of the Judiciary is the administrative organ of the Judicial Function, which can only regulate the rights that are guaranteed in the norm and that lacks procedure, but not, negatively modify the pre-existing ones as in the present case, in which through Resolution 085-2014 increases a requirement and changes the procedure previously established in the Code of Execution of Penalties and Social Rehabilitation (National Congress, 2006), in the Regulations Substitute for the General Regulation of Application of the Code of Execution of Penalties and Social Rehabilitation (Executive Function, 2001) and in the Regulation for the Granting of Reduction of Penalties by Merit System (National Council of Social Rehabilitation, 2008). With the application of the information collection instruments, it was determined that the Judicial Council with the issuance of Resolution 085-2014 violates the right to Legal Security, since it is not constitutionally empowered to establish requirements and procedures through a resolution. contrary to those already established, because with this change it is generating a decrease in the percentages of reduction of penalties for merits of persons deprived of liberty, despite the fact that the PPLs have fully complied with training, health, social work, and appropriate behavior programs offered by the Social Rehabilitation Centers, thus harming the Right to Freedom that the inmates who have positively changed their behavior become creditors, also generating prison overcrowding and violation of the other rights enjoyed by persons deprived of liberty.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    El derecho a la libertad del indígena y su correlación en el proceso penal ordinario en Ecuador
    (Universida Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Maestria en Derecho Penal, 2020-03) Palate Sailema, Mauricio Emmanuel; Acosta Morales, María Gabriela
    Preserving human rights and, above all, the freedom of the indigenous peoples of the planet, represents one of the priorities of all national and international organizations that seek to internalize integrated processes; leaving aside the discrimination and inequality of opportunities of the inhabitants without considering their races. When analyzing ordinary criminal legal processes, related to human rights, it is important to determine the space or environment where they occur. In this investigation, we consider Ecuador, known as a country that promotes its plurinational and pluricultural nature, trying to generate cohesion between its different processes that seek order and justice around punishable acts and its correlation towards respect and rights. to the freedom on the part of the natives, at the time of presenting ordinal judgments. Everything derives from the existence of internal conflicts that link irregularities and inconsistencies in the criminal procedure and the rights of indigenous people to the fairness of laws. There is a confrontation that does not help clarification or the growth of the rights of the inhabitants emanating from the Ecuadorian constitution. The research is descriptive qualitative, and is located within the paradigm of interpretation. At the same time it is supported by an experimental field investigation, taking advantage of the closeness of the researcher with the observed fact. The results reveal that the right to indigenous freedom must be constantly analyzed by all those involved in their respect and vulnerability. Criminal procedural laws should serve as a platform for all existing requirements within the legal framework to be met, regardless of the nature of the accused. Finally, the conclusions show the importance of respecting the rights to indigenous freedom, especially in ordinary criminal matters. The differences that may be presented should not be a reason to enter into conflicts that lead to the violation of human rights.