Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales
URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/892
Examinar
3 resultados
Resultados de la búsqueda
Item type:Ítem, La reversión de la expropiación como instrumento de justicia social: Evaluación de su impacto en la restitución de derechos a la propiedad(Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Juriprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Carrera de Derecho, 2025-08-01) ;Herrera Herrera, Melany MarcelaGuerrero Zúñiga, Édison RamiroThis research, entitled “The Reversion of Expropriation as an Instrument of Social Justice: Evaluation of its Impact on the Restitution of Property Rights”, follows a qualitative approach with a bibliographic-documentary design and an exploratory, descriptive, historical-critical, and socio-legal methodology. The general objective was to analyze the process of expropriation reversion in Ecuador and assess its effectiveness as a mechanism of social justice. The findings reveal that, although the reversion of expropriation is legally recognized in the Constitution, the LOSNCP, and the COOTAD, there is no clearly defined or structured procedure to ensure its proper application. This lack of legal clarity generates administrative and legal uncertainty, undermining its potential as a tool for social justice. Furthermore, the absence of secondary regulations leads to discretionary application by public entities. Regarding the restitution of rights, it is concluded that it plays a crucial role in comprehensive reparation processes, enabling not only the recovery of affected property but also the restoration of dignity to individuals and the strengthening of social cohesion. However, its actual impact remains limited due to procedural delays, arbitrary decisions, and a lack of legal safeguards, affecting both citizens and public administration negatively. It is recommended to reform the current legal framework, develop clear local ordinances, and implement public policies that promote a more effective, integral, and humane restitution of property rights, thereby fostering a genuine exercise of social justice in the country.Item type:Ítem, El justo precio en casos de expropiación y el Derecho a la propiedad de los administrados(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-09) ;Aguirre Villegas, Galo ArmandoFrías Raza, Sergio EdmundoThe investigation is carried out within the framework of the constitutional State of rights and justice, in which, by virtue of the exercise of public power, a constant interaction is generated between private property and public property. The Ecuadorian Constitution of 2008, recognizes and guarantees the right to property in all its forms, concomitantly establishes the possibility of expropriating the assets of individuals but enshrining the right to receive fair, adequate and timely compensation for the damage suffered, prohibiting all forms of confiscation. But, the content of paragraphs 10 and 16 of article 5 of the Organic Law for Efficiency in Public Administration, does not know the improvements made by the expropriated in their properties, if they do not have authorization, a provision that restricts the minimum content of the right to property determined in the Constitution. The research has a qualitative approach, since the issues raised were analyzed from a neutral point, from which, the reality of the events was approached and the causes and effects of the problem studied in the life of the expropriated owners and their incidence on their personal and family development from the affectation to their patrimony, by the application of an infra-constitutional norm (paragraphs 10 and 16 of article 5 of the Organic Law for Efficiency in Public Administration) which It also limits the behavior of public servants both in the administrative and in the ordinary judicial sphere. Reason why, the expropriated, in search of an alternative to find a way out of his situation, must go to the administration of constitutional justice. With the data and information collected, it was concluded that paragraphs 10 and 16 of article 5 of the Organic Law for Efficiency in Public Administration, constitute a current regulation, having been issued in compliance with the corresponding legislative procedure; but, it is not a valid norm due to its regressive material essence in the content of rights in a disproportionate way that contradicts the 2008 Constitution. It is presented as a proposal, the presentation of a claim of unconstitutionality for the content of paragraphs 10 and 16 of Art. 5 of the Organic Law for Efficiency in Public Procurement, in order for the Constitutional Court to carry out an abstract and material control of the demanded norm, in order to make effective the unity and coherence of the Ecuadorian legal system, under the rule of the principle of constitutional supremacy and the progressive development of rights and their nonregression.Item type:Ítem, “La expropiación genera pérdida de dinero y el patrimonio al titular del bien inmueble en la ciudad de ambato en el primer semestre del año 2009.”(2010)BARRIONUEVO NÚÑEZ, JOSÉ LUISLa perspectiva acerca de si es o no necesaria la ocupación de un bien en concreto es una garantía fundamental para el particular. La declaración de utilidad pública explícita o implícita garantiza la concurrencia del interés general, que vienen a justificar la expropiación, pero no entra ni de lejos en apreciación alguna acerca de la necesidad de que para llevarlo a cabo se ocupe un bien determinado con preferencia a otro. La Administración puede tomar como referencia el proyecto y los replanteos afectados, pero no siempre constarán con la precisión obligada los derechos e intereses afectados. En todo caso, es preciso dar una intervención al interesado, cuando menos para conseguir una indemnización suficiente desde el punto de vista jurídico del bien o derecho afectado. La presente propuesta va dirigida a los entes Públicos que tienen la potestad de realizar las Expropiaciones, pero al no tener clara la forma precisa de realizar los pagos a los afectados, nos vemos en la necesidad de buscar las modificaciones de las leyes referentes a la Expropiación. Es por eso que al hablar de la Expropiación se dice que es: Privar a una persona de la titularidad de un bien o de un derecho, dándole a cambio una indemnización. Se efectúa por motivos de utilidad pública o interés social previstos en las leyes. Al analizar todo el tema de expropiación podemos definir como objetivo que se debe establecer estrategias legales donde se mejore el proceso de expropiación; y, con esto definir nuevas normas legales para mejorar la indemnización a las personas que se vean afectadas por las expropiaciones
