Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/892

Examinar

Filtros

2010 - 201922020 - 20211

Ajustes

Tiene archivos: SíTema: search.filters.subject.MEDIDA CAUTELAR

Resultados de la búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
  • Miniatura
    Item type:Ítem,
    La caución en delitos de juicio de procedimiento directo de la unidad judicial penal de Ambato y el principio constitucional de proporcionalidad
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2021-01)
    Acurio Hidalgo, Marcelo Patricio
    ;
    Cortes Naranjo, Edwin Wilfrido
    The surety is that legal figure with which it is intended to guarantee the presence of the person processed in court; since it suspends the effects of preventive detention; so that once the responsibility is determined, everything can be restored to its normal condition that by actions or omissions have affected things or people; In criminal matters, the judges tend to ensure compliance with the sanction for the typical, unlawful act committed by the defendant and in a certain way improve the condition of that person who has been affected in some way, since this person becomes a victim the state guarantees the existence of means that allow something to remedy the injury suffered; However, it is necessary to point out that it is not only possible to ensure the rights of the alleged victim, but also to ensure the rights of the person to whom the crime is imputed and it is here that as long as there is no conviction, one must ensure the constitutional right to which every person is entitled, this being that of freedom; if there is indeed an investigation into the commission of a criminal act, it is as such an investigation, and therefore the deprivation of liberty covered by the figure of preventive detention must be considered ultimatum; reason for which the same regulations, this being the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code in the Ecuadorian case which provides for the figure of the surety in order to suspend the effects of preventive detention; Now, once it is about the surety, it is necessary that in order to fix it, the conditions and characteristics contemplated in the same legal body be taken into consideration in order not to violate the constitutional principle of proportionality; however this last precept has been broken in the application; since despite the fact that the regulations are clear; However, the judges at the time of setting the bond do so arbitrarily since it amounts to values that the defendants cannot meet, so compliance with preventive detention is a reality.
  • Miniatura
    Item type:Ítem,
    La fianza y la administración de justicia en materia penal
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Carrera de Derecho, 2019-11)
    Velasteguí Gómez, Aarón Adolfo
    ;
    Acosta Morales, Gabriela
    The importance of the present investigative work lies in the fact that it tends to an adequate judicial tutelage and legal security, without this constituting a symbolic postulate. The administration of justice in criminal matters must therefore apply and guarantee the rights of the parties, mostly the weakest subject in a criminal process (accused or accused). The methodology applied is the qualitative one, which consists of the investigator approaching or making contact with a real subject or individual, which offers useful and pertinent information, based on experiences, values, opinions, through techniques such as interviews or documentary analysis. The human being as an individual, being the cornerstone of social development, the Line of Research corresponds to Integral Social Human Development. The proposal is that, through a reform of article 522 of the Criminal Comprehensive Organic Code, the bond should be incorporated and establishe as a precautionary measure of a personal order other than pre-trial detention, in order to avoid to the extent that it restriction of the fundamental right to personal freedom.
  • Miniatura
    Item type:Ítem,
    EL APREMIO PERSONAL COMO MEDIDA CAUTELAR NO CUMPLE CON LA FINALIDAD DEL PAGO DE LAS PENSIONES ALIMENTICIAS EN EL JUZGADO OCTAVO DE LO CIVIL DEL CANTÓN PÍLLARO
    (2010)
    Castañeda Ron, María Daniela
    La facultad de jurisprudencia y ciencias sociales exige como requisito previo para la obtencion del titulo de abogada la presentacion y defensa de un trabajo investigativo, el mismo que va a demostrar la capacitacion que ha recibido en la Universidad asi como tambien la habilidad del estudiante de poner en juego estos conocimientos para el ejercicio de su profesion. En el presente caso, se ha selecionado el tema planteado, debido a que es muy recurrente en los Tribunales de Justicia del Ecuador, siendo preciso por lo tanto abordarlo desde distintas facetas: juridicas, psicologicas, humanas y sociales,con el proposito de resolverlo de la mejor manera a fin de lograr una solucion equitativa para los litigantes con el proposito de que la sociedad no sufra resquebrajamientos, creando de ste modo una cultura de razonamiento, equidad y justicia. Todo este trabajo se orienta a defender a la familia como celula fundamental de la sociedad ecuatoriana, pero especialemente a salvaguarfdar la integridad, el dearrollo emocional y psicologico del niño como ente que en un futuro va hacer parte integrante de la sociedad. El objetivo general de este trabajo ha sido fundamentalmente el de buscar y plantear nuevas alternativas para el pago oportuno de los alimentos al menor, desechando el recurso que ahora se utiliza con mayor frecuencia que es el Apremio y encarcelamientodel alimentante que no contribuye en nada a la solucion de los problemas sino que antes por el contrario los agrava, creandose un ambiente de hostilidad entre las partes.