Maestría en Derecho Constitucional

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/30517

Browse

Filters

20191

Settings

End date: 2019Subject: search.filters.subject.CONSTITUCIÓN

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    El principio de control de convencionalidad en las sentencias emitidas por la corte Constitucional del Ecuador
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Posgrado, Maestría en Comunicación, Desarrollo y Cambio Social, 2019-12) Pascumal Luna, Ricardo Fabian; Mayorga Naranjo, Nelson Eduardo
    This article gives an account of the object of the control of conventionality, in reference to the subjects obliged to apply it in the domestic legal system, from the perspective of the Inter-American Human Rights System. However, it was inquired how this principle is applied in the sentences issued. by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, and its impact on the internal legal order of the State. The importance and interest of this research is focused on the fact that through the methodology of content analysis, 276 sentences of the highest constitutional body in the country were studied, with the purpose of determining the degree of application of conventionality, understood as conventions, judgments, advisory opinions and in itself the control that all administrative, judicial and jurisdictional authority must perform. The results were surprising, 99% of the sentences studied they do not apply the principle of conventionality control. We would explain why Ecuador has been declared internationally responsible before the Inter-American System, in addition to the payment of millions in compensation for reparations to the victims. The conclusion drawn from this investigation is that we have an unconstitutional legislation and jurisdictional system. It is essential to conclude that the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador and no other norm of the internal legal order does not contemplate how and who should perform the control of conventionality of all acts derived from the jurisdictional organ, existing a normative and dogmatic vacuum in this regard.