La responsabilidad objetiva del estado y el error judicial en el derecho de repetición

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to analyze the relationship between the objective responsibility of the State for judicial error and the right of repetition, where the objective responsibility of the State and the judicial error in the right of repetition constitute a topic of great relevance in the contemporary legal field. It is crucial because it addresses the way in which the State assumes responsibility for errors committed in the judicial sphere and how these affect citizens regardless of age. For this purpose, teaching tools were used that focus on various scenarios such as types, methods, sources, techniques and instruments that will support while determining the population and the sample of the research to which it is directed, which also details the materials used, where we worked with a sample of 7 people, which allowed us to know that judicial error is seen in two types: attributable to people, professionals or not, and to the legal system due to loopholes or exceptional procedures. They can be de facto or de jure. While the right of repetition is a civil action that the State exercises against public servants for fraud or serious negligence in their duties. It arises when the damage repaired is due to your actions