Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/31916
Título : El Derecho Constitucional de no autoincriminación penal y el procedimiento abreviado del ecuador
Autor : Acosta Morales, María Gabriela
Morales Cajamarca, Paola Maribel
Palabras clave : CONSTITUCIÓN NO AUTOINCRIMINACIÓN
PROCEDIMIETO ABREVIADO
ADMINISTRACIÓN DE JUSTICIA
CÓDIGO ORGANICO INTEGRAL PENAL
VULNERABILIDAD DE DERECHOS
Fecha de publicación : ene-2021
Editorial : Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional
Resumen : The right of non-self-incrimination is in force in our constitution approved in 2008, therefore and in compliance with the speed and simplification of the processes, the abbreviated procedure is part of the decentralization of justice, being part of the Organic Code of Penal Procedure seeks to be more efficient by reducing the steps to issue a judgment. In article 635 of the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code, the abbreviated method is revealed as an alternative to the ordinary Penal procedure, proposing from the defense of the accused or the administration of justice methods for the reduction of a possible sentence, putting in evidence anti-constitutional laws that violate people's rights. For this reason, the principle of non-self-incrimination is affected by the need to reach an agreement between the parties in a trial. This is why the detonating factor is that one of the parties involved agrees to render versions of guilt in order to reduce or negotiate a sentence.The present work tries to analyze how a right such as non-self-incrimination is violated by actors who seek a benefit, be it these parts of those who direct the judicial norm by trying to expedite processes that take time until the trial. The right to autonomy of will of the parties constitutes for a good part of the doctrine a relatively new concept and sometimes considered of little doctrinal development, since it was from the French revolution and the development of new relations that a different conception of civil relations began to be created, based on the freedom of contracting. However, this freedom has been limited by legislation in order to guarantee legal security and has been relegated by normative formalities in some areas of the law. Just as the right of will has been established at the time of establishing a contractual relationship, a set of formalities have been developed for a very long time as a requirement for executing certain legal acts, so the same legislation has designed a whole system of protection for the contracting parties, which sometimes, as in the case of intestate succession, may be considered contrary to the autonomy of will. In this paper we will analyze the act of intestate succession as a characteristic act of notarial formality, its possible contravention of the autonomy of the will, and consequently, as an element generating limitations to the right to property. In this respect, an analysis will be made of whether the institution of succession and the formalities imposed by the notarial requirements could restrict the parties' right to autonomy of will and thus affect their rights.
Descripción : El derecho de no autoincrimación se encuentra vigente en nuestra constitución aprobada en el año 2008, por ello y dando cumplimiento a la celeridad y simplificación de los procesos, el procedimiento abreviado forma parte de la descentralización de la justicia, siendo parte del Código Orgánico de Procedimiento Penal busca la manera de ser más eficiente disminuyendo los pasos para emitir un juzgamiento. En el artículo 635 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal pone en manifiesto al procedimiento abreviado como una alternativa al procedimiento penal ordinario, planteando desde la defensa del acusado o desde la administración de justicia métodos para la reducción de una posible pena, poniendo en evidencia a recursos anti constitucionales que vulneran los derechos de las personas.Por tal motivo el principio de no autoincriminación se ve afectado por la necesidad de llegar a un acuerdo entre partes de un juicio y el detonante es que una de las partes involucradas acepte rendir versiones de culpabilidad con la finalidad de reducir o negociar una sentencia. El presente trabajo trata de analizar como un derecho como la no autoincrimación es vulnerado por actores que buscan un beneficio, sea estos partes de los que dirigen las normas jurídicas por tratar de agilitar procesos que llevan tiempo hasta el juzgamiento
URI : https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/31916
Aparece en las colecciones: Maestría en Derecho Constitucional

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
FJCS-POSG-245.pdf557,86 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.