Maestría en Derecho Constitucional
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/30517
Browse
8 results
Search Results
Item Mecanismos de la reparación integral a la víctima y la justicia inmaterial(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2021-07) Arias Galiano, Evelyn Gabriela; Arcos Morales, Jorge EnriqueEcuador has adopted integral reparation in its criminal justice system as a restorative element, which constitutes a constitutional right for victims of criminal offenses. It is expressly determined in article 18 of the Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control that "The reparation will be carried out according to the type of violation, the circumstances of the facts and the impact on the life project", with which the integral reparation It must be the result of the motivation of the constitutional judge, considering as the main element the proportionality that must exist between thelegal remedies and the declaration of violation of constitutional rights. Additionally, the same normative provision recognizes the type of possible repairs, without being an exhaustive list, which is the result of the reception of international standards; Thus, mention is expressly made of the measures of: restitution of the right, economic or patrimonial compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, guarantees of nonrepetition, obligation to investigate, recognition measures, public apologies, provision of public services, health care, among other In such a way that the restitio in integrum provides the victims of the transgressions of constitutional rights to enjoy the right in the most adequate way possible and, as far as possible, it is restored to the previous situation of the violation, when that is possible. Therefore, the following Degree Project aims to generate a study of the genesis of integral reparation, its principles, analyze the damages present in the victims and the reparation mechanisms provided by the Law. A specialized Unit is proposed to attend to the citizenship and the victims of criminal offenses, that only this typicity be addressed since the Public Defender's Office of Ecuador does not provide the specialized and technical attention that the victims need, there is no place where the rights that assist them, the amparo professed by article 78 of the Constitution of the Republic and article 68 of the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code and provide them with the mechanism to make their claims, providing citizens with basic knowledge in legal advice.Item El debido proceso y la proporcionalidad de las penas en la conducción de vehículos en estado de embriaguez(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2021-01) Gavilanes Altamirano, Danny Israel; Pazmiño Vargas, Klever AlonsoGuaranteeing respect for the rights of procedural subjects, as well as ensuring compliance with the guarantees of due process, are one of the fundamental pillars that the Ecuadorian State provides among its plurinational and multicultural principles. In turn, criminal law is the body in charge of carrying out the legal order, each time an irregularity or criminal offense occurs with the intention of protecting the legal security of society. Part of this safeguard is to enforce the different legal mechanisms, so that when a trial is used; There remains reliable and convincing evidence of having used due process, in cases where there is a need to punish a person, that it is proven that he has committed a criminal offense. The objective of the following Degree Work is to diagnose the general characteristics of due process and analyze the proportionality of the penalties in terms of their application, in cases related to the driving of vehicles in a state of intoxication, where it is sought to detect the possibility of the existence of a legal vacuum that violates human rights and, respect for the free movement of whoever commits the crime or infraction. It is a mixed investigation, directed towards the iterative or integrative, under the documentary modality, explanatory-descriptive and correlational field. The results of the investigation indicate that there is a disproportionality in the sanctions or penalties that arise from the violation of driving vehicles while intoxicated, typified in the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code (COIP), especially when compared with other criminal offenses of higher magnitude and are sanctioned by the same COIP in a non-proportional way, affirming among the conclusions the existence of a legal vacuum, with respect to these penalties that a judge sanctions, leaving aside for the legislators, the possibility of considering what is known as the abstract penalty, to measure in a coherent, suitable, necessary and weighted manner the possibility that the sanction is commensurate or proportional to the magnitude of the violation, without neglecting the damage to third parties that could be caused. Descriptors:Item El principio de proporcionalidad en la reparación integral a las víctimas de infracciones penales en la legislación ecuatoriana(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2021-01) Medina Medina, Vanessa Estefanía; Segovia Dueñas, José LuisEcuador, being a constitutional State of rights and justice, incorporated the principle of integral reparation in criminal law, being a purpose of the penalty should be strictly enforced, so in this degree plan it will be investigated as it has been applied this principle in conjunction with that of proportionality, because it will be demonstrated that the application of both principles is necessary to achieve this purpose, as well as the responsibility of the State to guarantee the fulfillment of the rights of people who come to the criminal system, for which it is investigated by means of the doctrine and comparative law which are the suitable and efficient ways of applying integral reparation, Mexico has been the one who has managed to comply with this part of the sentence, because it is the main responsible for the victim be repaired in the event that the guilty person does not comply with the compensation ordered by the judge, in the same way ra the Mexican legal system has several ways of complying with the reparation mechanisms through joint work with other public institutions, this can be accepted by Ecuadorian legislation and really comply with what is mandated by the Constitution and the Organic Integral Criminal Code ; On the other hand, it is investigated how the principle of proportionality should be applied so that the administrators of justice avoid applying comprehensive reparation in an arbitrary manner, since the rights of the victims are currently being undermined and they are being left in a state of defenselessness by how much by information obtained it is established that in most cases the sentence ordered by the judge is not fulfilled. Therefore, once the administrators of justice know more effective ways to apply this principle (comprehensive reparation) and the way in which they can add in the sentences the different forms of compensation established in the legislation and international treaties through the proportionality test, it will be possible to guarantee a true fulfillment of sentences and therefore of justice in criminal legislationItem La tutela judicial efectiva en el procedimiento de la acción ordinaria de protección(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-11) Guerrero Zuñiga, Edison Ramiro; Garnica Bustamante, Walter PatricioThe origin of the ordinary protection action as a jurisdictional guarantee in Ecuador has been the subject of extensive legal debates. Due to, our present investigation established the main characteristics and elements that this action must have it. In that point, the application of the Justice Court will not harm to the justice bodies and the administration of justice. Furthermore, the effective legal protection is a constitutional right and it was being developed the main elements of it. In this investigation, it will be approached two important rights, such as: the due process and the motivation in constitutional judgements. Also, it will be used ten emblematic cases as the main focus and contribution to this investigation. Each case has the constitutional judgments of the first instance, the second instance and the Constitutional Court where the problem of inadmissibility of ordinary protection actions appears. It is used a qualitative approach where it helps to interact with the object of the study so, the cases were used to examined the main elements of it and to develop some concepts and understanding by using the bibliographic documentary record and files of judgements about the studied problem. As a result of the analysis of each case, the investigation shows what happened in the cases and its interpretation with some doctrine, legal criteria of effective judicial protection and ordinary protection action. Specifically, it explained what happened in the cases in which the ordinary protection action was rejected or inadmissible where it was founded that they were inadmissible due to a faulty motivation of the Judge. The faulty motivation was derived from a poor academic preparation of judges and lawyers and mainly there is an incorrect application and interpretation of: concepts of fundamental rights; the principles & constitutional rules and the grounds for inadmissibility. All of these cause that, the right of the effective legal protection can be violated and the action can be denatured, so, it produces that effective rights protection mechanism will not be applicated.In this context, for the effective protection of the right to legal protection, it was recommended that it is necessary to continue with its study, train students, judges, lawyers, etc. Also, it is important to repeal the grounds for inadmissibility and claim to the Constitutional Court to continue emitting jurisprudence binding, to achieve the certainty of the application of Ecuadorian constitutional system. Otherwise, it will be emitted unmotivated judgments of first instance, second instance and constitutional court by judges, which it generates a detriment to the users of the administration of justice.Item La acción de protección y el procedimiento probatorio en el derecho constitucional ecuatoriano(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-10) Quishpe Cherres, Lucia Elizabeth; Jordán Buenaño, Janeth ElizabethThis research work is initially directed at the study of the jurisdictional guarantee of protective action, its origins, conceptual evolution, characteristics, as well as its normative evolution in Ecuador, linked to its effective assessment in the face of the violation of constitutional rights and its direct relationship with evidence, starting from the analysis of the principles that surround it, its characteristics and importance, as well as the constitutional right to evidence as a guarantee of proof. From which, the inexistence of a procedure that regulates the performance of the evidence in the jurisdictional guarantee of the protection action is specified. Therefore, the presumption of the lack of a specific evidentiary procedure in the jurisdictional guarantee of protection action is confirmed, which generates a violation of the right to due process. Constitutional law in its exercise of guardianship and custody of constitutional rights and constitutional guarantees is directly affected by the lack of regulation of evidence in the Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control, considering that this is the law that regulates the functioning of the Constitutional Court and the procedures of constitutional control in Ecuador. Hence the need to establish a procedure for the taking of evidence in the area of jurisdictional guarantee of the action of protection. Based on the fact that this jurisdictional guarantee is characterized by the protection demanded by a different legal discourse than the one that has traditionally been used in Ecuador, it requires progressive rationality, constituting a doorway to the solution of rights violations.Item El derecho a la seguridad jurídica respecto a los Bienes inmuebles en los procesos de prescripción Extraordinaria de dominio(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-10) Coello Hernández, Patricio Ruperto; Jordán Buenaño, Jeannette ElizabethThe purpose of this research work is to analyze and determine whether the absence of an express legal norm that demands the summons to the State as a procedural interested party, in lawsuits directed against the so-called unknown heirs and related to transferable rights and / or property rights over Real estate, especially those relating to causes of extraordinary prescription for ownership, violates the constitutional principle of legal security and other intrinsically related such as the right to defense and due process. In this context, the constitutional principle of legal security is conceived as respect for the Constitution and the law, through clear and precise rules in its mandate. By virtue of the aforementioned, the rules for summoning unknown heirs do not contemplate the possibility of considering the State, as an interested party, according to the succession rules expressed in article 1023 of the Civil Code. Therefore, the lack of legal regulations of an express nature that requires its summons, may violate legal security and the certainty of certain predictability in the law. In the present investigation the qualitative method was used, through the single case study research instrument, an analysis of Judgment No. 019-14-SEP-CC was carried out; By means of a content analysis instrument, extracts of citations of lawsuits on extraordinary prescription of domain were collected; and, through the interview instrument, the position of two judges regarding the subject under investigation was collected. By way of conclusion, it was determined that the State should be cited in cases related to unknown heirs, in accordance with the rules of intestate succession. However, it is an obligation of the judge as procedural guarantor, to verify all the necessary requirements in order to carry out the summons in strict adherence to the law.Item El acuerdo ministerial n° 5233-a del ministerio del interior y la vulneración al debido proceso en la separación de los funcionarios de la policía nacional del Ecuador(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-09) Moreno Gavilanes, William Fernando; Poaquiza Poaquiza, Ángel PatricioThe present investigation arises from the integration of two specific variables that structure the subject as a whole, establishing itself as: “THE MINISTERIAL AGREEMENT N° 5233-A OF THE MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR AND THE VIOLATION OF THE DUE PROCESS IN THE SEPARATION OF OFFICIALS OF THE ECUADOR NATIONAL POLICE”. It should also be mentioned that, the problematic axis in a succinct way, follows from the fact that the members of the National Police, not having passed the polygraph test at the time, have been subject to sanctions, without being able to exercise effective judicial protection, without being able to exercise the right to contradiction, without being able to exercise the right to self-defense, violating the principle of innocence; being that, these principles and rights, in addition to being part of the integrality of the rules of Due Process, are also recognized as fundamental; For this reason, it is conceived that the Ministerial Agreement subject to analysis attempts against such high designs of the Constitution, leaving aside the guarantee that it advocates. In chapter I of the investigation, the doctrinal background and the problematic reality of the project are presented, in order to justify the reason why this investigation has been developed and carried out. In chapter II, the state of the art of research, that is, previous research, has been established in relation to the variables proposed in the structuring of the topic; then, they are developed, under doctrinal aspects of different authors that validate the research, regarding the principles and rights that could be being violated in the problematic investigative context. In chapter III, the methodological foundation of the research is developed, the base being the quantitative-qualitative application, for which, the documentary and bibliographic analysis of the existing doctrine was taken, to establish a questionnaire submitted to a judgment of the respondents , so that these in turn, transform their perspectives to percentages that can give us a general conception of the problematic reality presented. In chapter IV, the conclusions and recommendations are developed, which have been obtained by the doctrinal, bibliographic study, plus the application, tabulation and analysis of the surveys.Item El derecho de recurrir ante las resoluciones o fallos de la función legislativa en el juicio político(Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-08) Silva Bustamante, Luis Alberto; Melo Delgado, Rosa HerlindaThe main objective of this research work is to deepen the importance of the right to due process in guaranteeing recourse to the resolutions issued by the legislative function within the impeachment, given that in Ecuador, regarding the topic of investigation, its absence has been historical. The Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, in its Article 76, numeral 7, literal m), establishes the right that people have to appeal a resolution or a decision when deciding on their rights, for which reason, when existing express regulations, the violation of this right is clearly evident, which is linked to the right to defense and therefore forms part of due process. In this sense, since there is no possibility of appealing the resolution adopted by the National Assembly in a political trial, due process is violated and therefore the politically prosecuted are affected in their rights. It is important to emphasize that the right of appeal is a constitutional right of scope for all people without exception. Therefore, by restricting this right in terms of impeachment, the principle of equality established in Article 11, numeral 2, ibid, is transgressed directly, in which it is prescribed that all persons shall be subject likewise with respect to rights and obligations, as well as the right to formal, material equality and non-discrimination enshrined in Article 66, numeral 4 of the constitutional text. Thus, when carrying out this reform, these constitutional precepts would harmonize the Constitution for its proper application. Therefore, by virtue of the aforementioned, there is a need for a higher body to review whether the procedure carried out in a political trial has been adhered to and respecting due process, so that, in this way, to be the aforementioned resolution must be ratified or distorted in this instance.