Maestría en Derecho Constitucional

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/30517

Browse

Filters

20201

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Guerrero Zuñiga, Edison RamiroSubject: search.filters.subject.DEBIDO PROCESO

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    La tutela judicial efectiva en el procedimiento de la acción ordinaria de protección
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho Constitucional, 2020-11) Guerrero Zuñiga, Edison Ramiro; Garnica Bustamante, Walter Patricio
    The origin of the ordinary protection action as a jurisdictional guarantee in Ecuador has been the subject of extensive legal debates. Due to, our present investigation established the main characteristics and elements that this action must have it. In that point, the application of the Justice Court will not harm to the justice bodies and the administration of justice. Furthermore, the effective legal protection is a constitutional right and it was being developed the main elements of it. In this investigation, it will be approached two important rights, such as: the due process and the motivation in constitutional judgements. Also, it will be used ten emblematic cases as the main focus and contribution to this investigation. Each case has the constitutional judgments of the first instance, the second instance and the Constitutional Court where the problem of inadmissibility of ordinary protection actions appears. It is used a qualitative approach where it helps to interact with the object of the study so, the cases were used to examined the main elements of it and to develop some concepts and understanding by using the bibliographic documentary record and files of judgements about the studied problem. As a result of the analysis of each case, the investigation shows what happened in the cases and its interpretation with some doctrine, legal criteria of effective judicial protection and ordinary protection action. Specifically, it explained what happened in the cases in which the ordinary protection action was rejected or inadmissible where it was founded that they were inadmissible due to a faulty motivation of the Judge. The faulty motivation was derived from a poor academic preparation of judges and lawyers and mainly there is an incorrect application and interpretation of: concepts of fundamental rights; the principles & constitutional rules and the grounds for inadmissibility. All of these cause that, the right of the effective legal protection can be violated and the action can be denatured, so, it produces that effective rights protection mechanism will not be applicated.In this context, for the effective protection of the right to legal protection, it was recommended that it is necessary to continue with its study, train students, judges, lawyers, etc. Also, it is important to repeal the grounds for inadmissibility and claim to the Constitutional Court to continue emitting jurisprudence binding, to achieve the certainty of the application of Ecuadorian constitutional system. Otherwise, it will be emitted unmotivated judgments of first instance, second instance and constitutional court by judges, which it generates a detriment to the users of the administration of justice.