Maestría en Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/29523

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    La criminalización del pasado judicial y los derechos constitucionales
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Posgrado, Maestría en Derecho penal y Procesal penal, 2019-06) Vizuete Gallardo, Marco Fernando; Garzón Villacrés, Iván Arsenio
    The present research work, Its purpose is to analyze the recidivism, from the point of view of the criminalization of the judicial past, that is to say that in Ecuadorian legislation there is recidivism in its regulations, which is applicable to people who have committed a new crime with the same elements, in this way violating Constitutional principles that contrasts with this particular regulation of recidivism. The criminal code, before the publication of the Organic Comprehensive Penal Code already contemplated this rule of recidivism in its article 77, said that there is recidivism when the accused returns to commit a crime after having committed an earlier one for which he received a conviction. Currently our Organic Comprehensive Criminal Code maintains this regulation but emphasizes the commission of a new criminal offense with the same elements, that is to say it refers to the specific recidivism of typicity: deceit or fault, where a third of the penalty is increased for the person who commits another crime. In this sense we can observe that the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador in article 11 number 2, guarantees non-criminalization by the judicial past of the persons, which would imply a violation of due process. It is considered that this article must be eliminated that contemplates our Integral Organic Penal Code since if we have a supra norm that is the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, There could not be a rule that violates the rights of people who have to be prosecuted because it is unconstitutional, It is evident that Constitutional Rights are violated.