Maestría en Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/29523

Browse

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    El ejercicio privado de la acción penal y el garantismo procesal en el código orgánico integral penal
    (Universidad Técnica de Ambato. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales, Unidad de Posgrado, Maestria en Derecho penal, 2020-10) Paredes Fuertes, Fernando Eduardo; Acosta Morales, María Gabriela
    The purpose of this investigation is to deepen the study of the private exercise of criminal action. The procedure as much as its applicability in the exercise and even more its direct connection with the procedural guarantee, as a new figure of the criminal dogmatic that consists in establishing the international parameters as well as constitutional of the right of due process and of the victim and processed in the palestra of the procedural system. The quantifiable methods to determine an exact consolidation of values that allow criticizing, analyzing and projecting conclusions have been developed through statistical data of the causes entered in the last year in both public and private action crimes, and its application has been qualified in the procedural guarantee, analyzing and applying surveys to professional, the same ones that have issued their criteria regarding the guarantees of the right to defense, precautionary measures and judging in absence. Likewise, we analyzed the ways to extinguish the private exercise of the action as a way to enforce the claims of the parties, as well as those crimes existing in the Ecuadorian legal as crimes of private action in a comparison to foreign standards that contain a wide range of private crimes that could be included in our criminal system. The forgetting of the legislative body as well as the excessive interference of the State has caused the non-existence of reforms to guarantee an effective process of private action, consequently, the low application of it produces the violation of procedural guarantees as well as unnecessary budgetary spending and procedural congestion. Therefore, the reforms are necessary for the improvement of the private procedure of the action, as well as the effectiveness of the procedural guarantees under the protection of a correct application of criminal justice.