Las excepciones dilatorias en juicio ejecutivo y el principio constitucional de celeridad

Abstract

Executives Trials are those processes by which based on a title (document) contains an obligation and clearly identifies the necessary parts, in addition to the title itself it is established that the agreement is currently required, can be made to the judge required compliance of the benefit due and in default the displacement of the person who is in default with respect to the dispositive powers of its heritage, its heritage and intervention in compliance with the commitment on your behalf. The executive Judgment is the procedure used at the request of a creditor against the defaulter to demand short, so to speak, summarily payment of the net amount that you owe, past due and under indubitable document. But it is estimated that much of the solution is given by the slowness of civil proceedings and the violation of the principle of speed already exists in the laws, which are unfortunately not well implemented because of the lack of importance given to the issue raised, which it has served as the basis for development. The development of this research will be easy to understand, because it is practically done in such a way that whoever has the opportunity to read it, will feed on how to give effect to these procedures. This paper aims to investigate what the effect produced dilatory exceptions during the pendency of the executory. It is my intention, if possible, be practical and timely. I have chosen this topic because in my status as a Law student in the Faculty of Rights and Jurisprudence has made me know that such exceptions only thing they want is to delay the processing of the executive cause and art.99 of the Code of Civil Procurement says, these exceptions tend to suspend or delay the resolution of background, this is the sentence that should dictate the judge hearing an executive cause.