La reparación del procesado en los casos de ratificación del estado de inocencia

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the reparation of the accused in cases of ratification of the state of innocence of a person who has been deprived of liberty for several days or months. The methodology used was the qualitative one based on documentary research on the problem raised, as well as the carrying out of case studies where people have been detained and deprived of their liberty for an indeterminate time, and that in the respective process has not been found elements of conviction to consider him as accused, declaring the dismissal in the case. It is proposed as a conclusion that there is no procedure where people can request comprehensive reparation against the State, to compensate for the damage caused by having been deprived of liberty to a person for being innocent. The legal norm repeats that if a conviction is reformed or revoked, through the appeal for review, the State must repair the person who suffered punishment as a result of said sentence and that once the responsibility of servants or servants for such acts has been declared, he will have to repeat against them in the manner indicated in the Organic Code of the Judicial Function. Although the third paragraph of article 15 of the Organic Code of the Judicial Function refers to the appeal for review as the ideal way for a conviction to be revoked or reformed and the obligation of the State to repair the person who suffered punishment as a result can be generated of such a sentence.